Lyft condamné à 2,1 millions de dollars pour des publicités trompeuses sur les paiements des conducteurs

The FTC Takes Action Against Lyft for Misleading Driver Pay Claims

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has made a landmark move by announcing a $2.1 million settlement with the rideshare company Lyft. This action stems from accusations that Lyft has been misleading drivers about their potential earnings. The settlement mandates significant changes in how Lyft advertises driver pay.

Understanding the Misleading Practices

Lyft's advertising strategies claimed that drivers could earn specific hourly amounts that were not reflective of average earnings. For example, they advertised potential earnings of "up to $33" per hour for driving in Atlanta. However, these figures were based on the earnings of the top fifth of drivers, thus inflating the reality for most drivers by as much as 30%. Moreover, Lyft included tips in its calculations, further skewing the representation of earnings.

FTC's Stance on Worker Misrepresentation

FTC Chair Lina M. Khan has emphasized, "It is illegal to lure workers with misleading claims about how much they will earn on the job." This statement reinforces the FTC’s commitment to hold companies accountable for exploiting American workers through dishonest advertising practices.

Lyft's Earnings Guarantees Misunderstood

In addition to inflated hourly pay claims, Lyft also promoted earnings guarantees, falsely leading drivers to believe they would receive bonuses for completing rides. For instance, one ad promised $975 for completing 45 rides in a weekend, but the FTC revealed this was merely a conditional pay guarantee, not an additional bonus. This clarification will now be mandatory in future advertisements.

Lyft's Response and Future Compliance

In light of the FTC's findings, Lyft has stated it is committed to adhering to the agency's best practices when conveying earnings information to drivers. The company has already implemented changes to provide a clearer depiction of earning potential.

Labor Regulation Challenges for Rideshare Companies

This settlement comes at a time when both Lyft and its competitor, Uber, are facing increased scrutiny and regulation from various state and municipal bodies. For instance, Massachusetts has enacted laws requiring rideshare companies to ensure a minimum wage for drivers. Similarly, in New York City, there have been reports of drivers being locked out of their apps to control earnings in compliance with local regulations.

Conclusion

The FTC's action against Lyft highlights a significant effort to enhance transparency in the gig economy, particularly concerning drivers’ earnings. This landmark settlement may pave the way for more stringent regulations in the gig work sector, ensuring fair treatment for all workers.