Cardano Foundation Addresses Recent Criticisms and Internal Conflicts
In a recent statement reported by PANews, the Cardano Foundation has responded to growing concerns regarding its role within the blockchain ecosystem. This response comes after facing scrutiny due to internal conflicts and the marginalization of significant contributors, including Cardano's founder, Charles Hoskinson.
Clarification on Catalyst Fund Project Involvement
On December 16, the foundation took to the Cardano forum to publish an official blog and frequently asked questions (FAQ) document aimed at clarifying its position within the Catalyst project, particularly concerning Catalyst Fund 13.
Commitment to Decentralization and Sustainability
The foundation emphasized its ongoing active participation in the Catalyst project and reiterated its commitment to decentralization, governance, and sustainability. They highlighted their focus on supporting projects that align with these core principles.
Challenges with Voter Participation
Despite these efforts, the foundation acknowledges an issue with voter participation in the Catalyst project. As of now, only 4.8 billion ADA have been registered for voting, a stark contrast to the total of 35 billion ADA in circulation. This raises questions about community engagement and the effectiveness of governance mechanisms in place.
Voting Rights and Future Transparency Initiatives
The Cardano Foundation currently holds 180 million ADA, which accounts for merely 3.75% of the registered voting rights.
In response to these challenges, they have vowed to:
- Enhance future voting transparency.
- Establish clearer voting and ADA allocation standards.
- Encourage other stakeholders to adopt similar standards for balanced decision-making.
Upcoming Technical Blog on Voting Process
To provide further clarity, the foundation has also announced plans to release a technical blog that will delve into the voting process, offering insights into how the system operates.
Conclusion
The Cardano Foundation is actively engaging with community concerns and taking steps to ensure a more transparent and participative governance structure within its ecosystem. As discussions continue, stakeholders will be looking for tangible improvements in voter engagement and governance.
Leave a comment
All comments are moderated before being published.
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.